tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3613525030683671127.post2561198754700969551..comments2023-10-12T14:09:33.965-07:00Comments on The Biblia Hebraica Blog: Thoughts on "The Bible's Buried Secrets'Douglas Mangumhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15267532075493569019noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3613525030683671127.post-80679876007567457282008-11-20T18:14:00.000-08:002008-11-20T18:14:00.000-08:00You didn't miss much in the first 15 min. It was ...You didn't miss much in the first 15 min. It was mostly intro stuff that was repeated at the end.<BR/><BR/>Unfortunately, a certain amount of eisegesis is present in all interpretations. Some parts were worse than others for the level of speculation they were trying to pass off as fact.<BR/><BR/>I have to confess that I have no idea what you're trying to say with "the dates and stories would have seemed to have matched up better had the 'BC' been changed to 'AD'." The evidence they were dealing with in the program was virtually all BC.Douglas Mangumhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15267532075493569019noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3613525030683671127.post-57658143956675208142008-11-20T15:10:00.000-08:002008-11-20T15:10:00.000-08:00I was amazed to see the depth of eisegesis they we...I was amazed to see the depth of eisegesis they were able to extrapolate from their artifacts. I did miss the first 15 min. but I can't believe that they would have shown much then? <BR/>In any case, the dates and the stories would have seemed to have matched up better had the 'BC' been changed to 'AD'.WillofGod72https://www.blogger.com/profile/15143464609962728579noreply@blogger.com